JCVVS Newsletter
September 2007
|
|
Morita Therapy Offered in Connecticut |
The Connecticut Office for Victim Services is hosting a
two-day interactive and experiential course, October
16-17, on Morita Therapy, an internationally practiced
holistic therapeutic system and mental health
approach based upon Eastern lifeways and science.
The course is intended to assist mental health,
human service, counseling, victim assistance and
trauma intervention professionals learn the theory and
principles of Morita Therapy and their application for
treatment populations and personal growth.
Dr. Brian Ogawa, department chair of the
Human Services Department at Washburn University,
is an internationally recognized pioneer of the
adaptation of Morita Therapy into the West. His new
book, "A River to Live by: The 12 Life Principles of
Morita Therapy," will be referenced in the course.
|
|
Executive Committee Member Promoted |
Dr. Steven Walker has been promoted to the position
of Associate Dean for the College of Social Science at
California State University-Fresno. Steve has over 35
years of administrative experience in higher
education, directing alcohol/drug treatment programs
and several private non-profit clinical programs.
At
CSU-Fresno, he was instrumental in creating the first
Victimology major in the United States, while also
assisting in the creation of the academic programs in
victim services at Washburn University. As chair of the
Criminology Department at CSU-Fresno for the last
four years, the department experienced phenomenal
growth. During that time, he led the University's
successful development of the Joint Doctorate in
Forensic and Behavioral Science.
|
|
Research and Program Review |
JCVVS e-newsletter reviews offer a brief synopsis of
research and programs relevant to violence and victim
studies. Brevity does not allow for comprehensive
analysis, rather key points and observations for further
review and consideration. Reviews are provided by
persons affiliated by the JCVVS and do not
necessarily reflect the position of the JCVVS or the
affiliate Universities.
Author: Brian K. Payne
Title: Victim Advocates' Perceptions
of the Role
of Health Care Workers in Sexual Assault Cases
Source: Criminal Justice Policy Review
2007, Vol.
18(1), pp. 81-94.
Reviewer: Bernadette Muscat
This article focuses on the results of a survey that was
distributed to 44 rape crisis center workers in the
Commonwealth of Virginia regarding their perceived
collaborative relationships with allied professionals
(law enforcement, the criminal justice system, health
care professionals, mental health providers,
victim/witness programs, and the Department of
Social Services). The respondents were specifically
asked about any challenges faced in working with
health and mental health care providers. The results
indicated that advocates had fewer problems with
health care workers than with representatives of the
criminal justice system including law enforcement.
When problems with health care workers were noted,
the barriers to service stemmed from four key areas.
First, geographic isolation particularly in rural areas
that may not have access to Sexual Assault Nurse
Examiners or even rape kits necessitating victim
transportation to a provider that may be several hours
away. The next barrier was health care workers who
overstep their occupational boundaries by trying to be
a victim advocate and/or by providing referrals for
services within the community. A third perceived
problem was subcultural organizational barriers in
which health care rules takes precedence over victim
services. For example, victim advocates noted that
since the implementation of Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), health care
providers are reluctant to contact victim advocates for
rape exam accompaniments. A final perceived barrier
was problems in communication and patient referrals
to crisis centers.
The second part of the survey specifically asked about
perceived barriers in working with mental health
providers. Again, four challenges were noted in the
collaborative working relationship. The first perceived
barrier was role ambiguity because some mental
health providers try to be crisis workers. The two
examples noted were mental health workers providing
court accompaniments and/or not limiting assistance
to therapy. The next barrier was inappropriate referrals
to crisis centers to work with victims with a long history
of sexual assault. The advocates noted that the focus
of their work is on working with victims in crisis and
not with those with long-term mental health problems.
In that case the appropriate procedure is for the rape
crisis center to make a mental health referral not vice
versa. A third perceived barrier was a lack of funding
for mental health care in the community. The
advocates noted that funding did not cause problems
for collaboration, but it did create problems for the
victims with referrals, long waiting lists to see a
mental health provider, and overworked providers who
are not able to effectively work with victims. Finally,
some advocates suggested that mental health
providers do not have an appropriate understanding of
the dynamics of sexual assault including the rape
trauma syndrome and Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD).
The article concludes with a few suggestions for
improving collaborative working relationships. First,
communities need sexual assault response plans
that give each occupation a specific role in sexual
assault cases. Each role must be outlined and
followed to reduce situations of overstepping
boundaries, role ambiguity, and inappropriate
referrals. Next, sexual assault response teams are
needed to bring victim advocates and allied
professionals together to discuss sexual assault and
assault cases from their varying perspectives. These
teams can be instrumental in building
communication, encouraging collaboration, and
breaking down barriers. Finally, increased funding is
needed to provide more and better services to victims.
It is equally important to acknowledge how the lack of
funding impacts victim recovery and participation in
the criminal justice system with policy makers who
have the ability to increase funding for victim services
and mental health.

 |
 |
|