JCVVS Newsletter
May 2009
|
|
Conference Update: Responding to Crime Victims with Disabilities |
Registration Open
Registration for the conference is now open. Early
registration is encouraged with a discounted rate
through June 12, 2009.
Community Team Scholarships
Community team scholarship applications are being
accepted through June 1, 2009. Scholarships are for
reimbursable expenses, including the standard
registration fee.
|
|
Minnesota Contract: Critical Analysis of Victim Assistance |
The Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of
Justice Programs contracted with the JCVVS to offers
the Critical Analysis of Victim Assistance
program April 15-17, 2009. Fifteen practitioners
from across the state participated in the program.
Alyssa York of the Committee Against Domestic
Abuse appreciated the "opportunity to expand and
learn not only information to bring home to my
organization but to use personally in how I think and
react to people I come in contact with on a daily
basis." Jessalyn Frank of CSD of Minnesota
commented, "I appreciated the inclusive of diverse
groups and the sensitivity to diverse situations the
course allowed. It was a safe place to learn."
For more information call Thomas Underwood at
(785) 670-1242 or visit the webpage.
|
|
Research and Program Review |
JCVVS e-newsletter reviews offer a brief synopsis
of research and programs relevant to violence and
victim studies. Brevity does not allow for
comprehensive analysis, rather key points and
observations for further review and consideration.
Reviews are provided by persons affiliated by the
JCVVS and do not necessarily reflect the position of
the JCVVS or the affiliate Universities.
Authors: Campbell, R.
Title: Rape survivors experience with the legal
and medical systems: Do rape victim advocates make
a difference?
Date: 2006
Publisher: Violence Against Women, 12, pp. 30-
45.
Reviewer: Tracy Tambora, Ph.D.
Campbell (2006) questioned whether rape survivors
who had the assistance of rape victim advocates had
more positive experiences with the legal and medical
systems compared to those who did not work with
victim advocates. The researchers gathered a sample
of rape victims from two large, urban hospitals. Both
hospitals were the primary hospital in their respective
police precincts where law enforcement took rape
victims for treatment. In addition, both hospitals had
similar numbers of rape victims served per year, the
number of doctors and SANE nurses serving those
victims, and the type of population the hospital served.
The main difference between the two hospitals was
that one had a policy to page rape victim advocates
from a local RCC to come assist survivors of rape
throughout their ER visit (Site #1) and the other did not
(Site #2).
Site 2 data collection resulted in a sample of 36
survivors; all of whom worked with rape victim
advocates. Of these victims, 17 also talked with police
either before arriving at or during their hospital care.
Site 2 data collection resulted in a sample of 45
survivors; 28 had contact with police. Information was
gathered via a tape recorded, orally administered
checklist. Questions focused on types of services that
the survivors received; interactions with the legal and
medical community; and how survivors felt following
their contact with members of the legal or medical
community.
Results revealed rape survivors who worked with
advocates reported receiving more services from the
legal and medical systems. Most survivors did not
receive emergency contraception (about one third);
however, this rate is common for advocate-assisted
cases and is significantly higher than for women who
did not work with an advocate. Beyond service delivery,
most survivors who worked with advocates reported
less secondary victimization from legal and medical
system personnel, and less post-system-contact
distress than those who did not have the assistance
of advocates. Campbell (2006) reports that survivors
who had the assistance of an advocate were
significantly more likely to have police reports taken
and were less likely to be treated negatively by police
officers. In addition, these women also reported less
distress after their contact with the legal
system.
This research provides support for the assertion that
victim advocates are a valuable supportive service for
survivors of rape and sexual assault. This research
supports the notion that even in these difficult
economic times, advocate positions should be
preserved.

 |
 |
|